1st Thursday [3]: L.Frank Baum’s “The Wizard of Oz”

What can I say about a 115-year old book that has for 75 years been a movie and long ago became a well-loved classic? I guess all I can do is tell you my experience, and try to bring Dorothy home one more time.

20150401_184417[1]As corny as it may be, the film The Wizard of Oz remains one of my all-time favorites. It was the first present Jennifer ever gave to me, on VHS, in 1997. I also own it on DVD, have a companion book, and Life Magazine’s anniversary celebration booklet. 2014 was the 75th anniversary of its theatrical release, and I was fortunate enough to see it on the big screen for the first time when it played in Columbia for two nights last fall. I’ve even seen it on stage. But I had not yet read the book, and I felt I had to do that to truly call myself a fan.

Jen prepared me for a story much more sinister than the one presented in the movie, and she was right! Forget that there is no amazing singing to keep the reader in a spirited mood, or that Dorothy was away from her Aunt Em and Uncle Henry for weeks rather than what seemed to be a couple of days. The book also detailed the killing of various creatures, the enslavement of multiple races, and brutal murder attempts of the Scarecrow and Tin Man. The Lion is imprisoned and starved.

I was already prepared for the self-dismemberment the woodsman inflicted 20150401_185141[1]upon himself, thanks to seeing the story at the Arrow Rock Lyceum Theatre a couple years ago. That did not make it any less puzzling to read, however. I suppose I should have read it as though I were a child, because I suspect the story would have felt wizvery different. When Jen and I saw the film in the theater, I tried to watch as though I had never seen it before (and really, I discovered, I never had!). I should have taken the same approach to the book. I am certain that would have helped me appreciate it more, as well.

Don’t get me wrong — I still liked it, but I was frustrated at times. I became annoyed with the repetition. “Then I shall never get a heart.”  “And I will never get courage.”  “And I will never get back to Kansas.” I get it, already. How many times must the Scarecrow have a good idea, the Tin Man shed a tear, or the Lion confront a challenge before one of them says to the other: “You know what? You’re good. You don’t need to see the Wizard.”

I did enjoy a few moments, especially. The first was when Dorothy had first told the Scarecrow where she was from and how it was much less colorful than the land of Oz. His reply about the people there was quite funny, inadvertently suggesting that the brainless are smarter than the people of Kansas:

Of course I cannot understand it. If your heads were stuffed with straw, like mine, you would probably all live in the beautiful places and then Kansas would have no people at all.

Another humorous line was when the guard outside the throne room of Oz is surprised to hear that the group does not intend to become slaves of the Witch, but to destroy her.

witch

Oh, …no one has ever destroyed her before…

Clearly not.

While the movie alters much of the story, I liked that it subtly honored the book in the exchange between Mrs. Gulch and Uncle Henry, when she claimed that Toto had bit her on the leg. In the book it is said that the dog once bit the Witch in the same place. Only a reader of the book (or this blog) would know the reference.

The Witch seems much less powerful in the book, and she doesn’t harass the group along their journey as she does in the movie. Her demise is equally anticlimactic in both, and made College Humor’s six worst movie villain deaths list. But how else is Dorothy the Small and Meek to destroy a Wicked Old Witch?

20150401_184557[1]

I finished the book in about a week, but decided quickly that a person really should be able to get through it in a couple of hours at the most. But then I saw a reviewer on my library website say that he wished he had read it slower, to better appreciate the beautiful settings. I think it is true that a quick read would lead a person to overlook some wonderful details.

There are plenty of theories about the deeper meanings in the story, but I continue to stick to the more obvious one: That each of us possesses inside the characteristics we believe we lack. The Scarecrow, Tin Man, and Lion all made use of the things they sought from the Wizard while on their way to see him. Even Dorothy benefited from that which she sought: While she was clearly not in Kansas anymore, without question Kansas was still in her, and her continued thoughts of it helped her return. We shall overcome.


Sadly, the book did not answer a lingering question I have that arose from the movie: Where does the red brick road go?

brickroad

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “1st Thursday [3]: L.Frank Baum’s “The Wizard of Oz”

  1. My mother took me to see the film in 1950’s. I was about seven years old, maybe less it’s hard to remember. What I do remember was spending most of the time, on the floor hiding from the gruesome aspects of the tale. While I have seen the film since, a couple of times. I still found it to be a horrible story, for the reasons cited in your blog. Yes, the plot goes deeper than the surface. For it’s time, the sets were magnificent. – I always thought the yellow brick road led to Oz? I have never been enamoured of the film, likely because of my childhood experience? Still, you make some salient points.

    Films converted from books are seldom any good. The films, in no way can convey the same imagination as the written words. Films compressed into 90-120 minutes a story that might take 8 hours to read? As pointed out here. Can anyone point me to a film, that was an improvement on the book? Cheers Jamie.

    Liked by 1 person

    • In this case I liked the movie much more. As film technology improves, scenery becomes much more breathtaking on the screen than it could ever be in my imagination based on words on a page. With the exception, here, of the awful tornado in the film, which lacked only a sound effect of a person saying, “Whirr!” or, “Whooo!” to make it the worst special effect ever.

      If they remade the movie today to very closely resemble the book, it would have to be for grown-ups only!

      Like

  2. The yellow brick road goes to Oz, but what about the red one, seen at the beginning, in the center of Munchkin Land, set inside the yellow? Jennifer noticed the gray brick, which starts as a big circle and then splits into two tiny roads. Where do those go!? Surely someplace even more amazing than Oz! 🙂

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s